← Alle kamper

BLNO HERRER · OFFISIELL KAMPRAPPORT

Tromsø Storm 74–100 Frøya

Åpne teknisk kamprapport (PDF · engelsk)

NHA ANALYST REPORT

The story of the game

What decided it

Frøya beat Tromsø Storm 100-74. The largest positive scoring-channel difference was 22 points from two-pointers. The full margin accounts for +22 from two-pointers, +4 from free throws, +0 from three-pointers; these channels sum to the 26-point result. Frøya also had the higher shot-value return (56% to 41.3% eFG). This is an accounting explanation of the result; the actions that created those opportunities require film.

Shooting and scoring

Tromsø Storm made 13/34 two-pointers and 12/41 threes; Frøya made 24/42 twos and 12/33 threes. Free throws added 12 points for Tromsø Storm and 16 for Frøya. Those channels account for the official score; the attempt counts show whether the edge came from shot volume or conversion.

Possession battle

Tromsø Storm committed 24 turnovers (22.9% TOV%) and Frøya committed 17 (16.9%). Offensive rebounds were 16-9, while ORB% was 31.4%-23.7%. A rebound total by itself does not measure control of available misses, and turnovers do not prove a particular defensive scheme.

Player contributions

Tromsø Storm's leading scorer was Grant Sitton: 22 points on 7/20 field goals and 3/3 free throws in 30.8 minutes, with 0 assists and 4 rebounds. This describes production and load in this game, rather than individual impact independent of teammates.

Frøya's leading scorer was Drake Downs: 20 points on 8/15 field goals and 1/1 free throws in 26.9 minutes, with 4 assists and 8 rebounds. This describes production and load in this game, rather than individual impact independent of teammates.

Questions for review

  • Shot value: Tromsø Storm's eFG% was 41.3% and Frøya's was 56%, a 14.7-point difference. Compare attempts and free throws before attributing the outcome to shot selection.
  • Possessions: Tromsø Storm had 24 turnovers and Frøya 17; compare their rates with the rebound and free-throw totals rather than treating one number as the whole explanation.
  • Next review: use video to test the actions and matchups behind these box-score patterns; the event log supports timing and scoring, not a claim about a specific play or defensive coverage.

Avansert lagsammenligning

Offisielle tall fra kampskjema

Tromsø Storm logoTromsø Storm88.783.4108.9-25.590.341.345.822.931.417.3
Frøya logoFrøya91.8108.983.425.590.35659.716.923.726.7

NHA LAB · ESTIMERT FRA HENDELSESDATA

Skuddutløsningstid

Estimerte sekunder fra sist registrerte start på ballbesittelsen til hvert skuddforsøk. Tidlig: 0–7 sek.; midt: 8–15 sek.; sent: 16–24 sek. Dekningsgrad viser andelen skuddforsøk som kunne klassifiseres fra den offisielle hendelsesloggen.

Tromsø Storm71/7594.710.433.843.722.5
Frøya68/7590.711.529.444.126.5

NHA LAB · HENDELSESDATA

Poengutvikling

Samlet poengutvikling gjennom kampens 40 minutter. Hvert trinn er et treff på straffekast, topoenger eller trepoenger fra de offisielle hendelsesdataene.

Tromsø Storm · 74Frøya · 100
Q1Q2Q3Q41000